The Great Dinosaur Schism: A Critical Analysis That Will Define Our Community

Community Hub Guilds
1

Tweet_1614499624352_1614499634915
Tweet_1614499624352_1614499634915549×309 8.07 KB

While we anxiously await hackathon results, let’s settle the REAL important debate…

The Evidence Presented

Two seemingly identical sauropods. But are they really?

After extensive analysis (approximately 47 seconds of deep contemplation), leading researchers have identified fundamental philosophical differences that demand immediate community consensus.

Team Dinosaur #1: The Innovators

Core Arguments:

  • Left-side positioning = progressive thinking
  • Slightly forward lean suggests urgency and momentum
  • The tie positioning demonstrates professional readiness
  • First in sequence = natural leadership qualities

Supporting Evidence:

  • 73% of successful hackathon teams historically chose left-positioned options*
  • Dinosaur #1’s posture suggests “ready to disrupt the Jurassic ecosystem”
  • The confident stance mirrors successful startup founders

Team Dinosaur #2: The Strategists

Core Arguments:

  • Right-side advantage = strategic positioning
  • Subtle backward lean indicates thoughtful consideration
  • The tie angle shows adaptability under pressure
  • Second position = learning from others’ mistakes

Supporting Evidence:

  • Right-brain dominance correlates with creative problem-solving*
  • Dinosaur #2’s stance suggests “measure twice, evolve once”
  • Historical data shows second-movers often achieve market dominance

The Stakes

This isn’t just about dinosaurs. This is about:

  • Community Identity: Are we innovators or strategists?
  • Future Direction: Will we lead with boldness or wisdom?
  • Philosophical Alignment: Can our community survive this fundamental schism?

Official Voting Instructions

  1. Analyze both dinosaurs for exactly 30 seconds
  2. Consider your core values and life philosophy
  3. Choose your champion
  4. Defend your choice with passionate conviction
  5. Prepare for the inevitable community split

The Hidden Truth

Some say the real dinosaur debate was the friends we made along the way…

But seriously, while we wait for those hackathon results, let’s see how divided we can get over two identical prehistoric creatures.

Cast your vote below and defend your choice like your commit history depends on it!

*Disclaimer: Statistics may be completely fabricated for dramatic effect

What’s your choice: Team #1 or Team #2? The future of our community hangs in the balance!

  • Team Dinosaur #1: The Innovators
  • Team Dinosaur #2: The Strategists
0 voters
2 Likes
2

I have a lot of points to make, but as Team #2 I will hold on to them for now as I” measure twice and evolve once” :sweat_smile:

2 Likes
3

As team #1, I think all you’re demonstrating is a lack of professional readiness :joy:

1 Like
4

“The Devil begins with froth on the lips of an angel entering into battle for a holy and just cause. Everything turns to dust: people, ideologies, — but eternal is the spirit of hatred in a righteous struggle, and that’s why evil on earth has no end. The style of discussion is more important than its subject”.

– Grigory Pomerants

IMO it is irrelevant. It doesn’t matter. Innovation cannot live without strategy.

How will you apply your innovation?

Strategy is pointless without innovation.

What is the point of planning if nothing changes? And without innovation nothing will change. Because why?

Maybe we can see how to merge interests together?
I like your article on how to build network effects by working together rather than splitting into different teams :grin:

1 Like