In traditional tech, MVP stands for Minimum Viable Product. But in early stage Web3 AI projects, many teams are treating it like a Maximum Visionary Prototype
And that creates a real issue
There is pressure in this space. Token holders, ecosystem grants, hype cycles, investor expectations. All of it pushes teams to over polish what was supposed to be a first version. Instead of launching something usable and focused, teams delay releases, chase perfect dashboards, try to plug in every feature, and in the process lose the speed and feedback loop that MVPs are meant to provide
But here’s the nuance. In Web3 and AI, your users are early adopters. Your protocol is both product and infrastructure. The bar is different. A poor experience or an unreliable AI output can break trust quickly. So maybe the question is not whether MVPs should be perfect, but rather what must be working before something qualifies as viable
Here are a few points to ground the discussion
MVP does not mean incomplete. It means focused. One or two core actions should work well. Everything else can wait
In AI, if inference or user interaction is central, then the output must feel clear and meaningful even if the design is rough
In Web3, trust is part of the experience. Wallet connections, transaction confirmations, and data handling need to be stable and secure
You do not need ten features. You need one that works well and tells the right story. The faster you ship, the faster you learn. But if what you ship breaks trust, you might not get another chance
So how do we find the balance
How do we define viable in a space where the product, protocol, and community are intertwined from the start. Should MVPs in Web3 AI include polished AI outputs, smooth UX, or chain integrations or is that already too much
When is it acceptable to launch something that is ugly but functional, and when does that approach become dangerous
Would love to hear from people building in this space. If you have shipped an MVP, supported a team through early versions, or watched a project succeed or struggle because of how they defined viable, your insight is welcome
Let us talk about how to build early but build smart