Protocol UX is not just UI. What if experience started deeper?

Hyperion Guilds Marketing Guild
1

:thread:Here’s a quick idea:

We often say a product has “bad UX” — but what if the problem isn’t the interface…
It’s the protocol underneath?

  • If your gas fees are unpredictable — that’s UX.

  • If your wallet flow is clunky — that’s UX.

  • If your governance takes 7 clicks to delegate — yep, that’s UX too.

UX doesn’t start at the button.
It starts at the block.

Designing great Web3 UX isn’t just about cleaner front-ends.
It’s about making the entire stack feel understandable, predictable, and human.

Could “protocol-level UX” be the next design challenge we need to solve?

25 Likes
2

Agreed. UX plays a very important role in anything that we build.

12 Likes
3

Sometimes the UX of a dApp is so poor that if you’re unfamiliar with it, you’re completely lost and it feels like using an iPhone where you’re forced down a strict path. Developers often build products with overly complicated flows: sign this, approve that, add liquidity here and there, and eventually you’ll get Token X… which you then need to swap for Token Z to finally earn rewards in Token B. It’s exhausting.

As a developer, your have to abstract away all these steps, bundle dozens of micro-transactions into a single contract or flow. Make it easy. Respect the user’s time. Deliver a financial tool that works intuitively without requiring deep technical knowledge or jumping through five different pages just to earn a reward.

This isn’t about blaming everyone, but the reality is that CEXs are still far more approachable for the average user than most dApps. That should tell us we’re doing something wrong, shouldn’t it?

5 Likes
4

Absolutely agree with this. We often blame “UX” like it’s just about buttons and layout — but the real friction lives deeper, in the protocol design itself.

You shouldn’t need to babysit 5 different screens, sign 4 approvals, swap across 3 tokens… just to get a basic reward. That’s not user flow — that’s user punishment.

Good UX isn’t just skin-deep. It’s about flow, logic, and removing pain at the protocol level. What if the chain itself was optimized for humans, not just devs?

Maybe it’s time we stop patching frontends and start rethinking UX from the block up.

3 Likes
5

For us, the challenge is to simplify that experience without compromising decentralization, security, and flexibility. We believe that great Web3 UX should empower users, making the complex feel effortless and intuitive.

As the space continues to evolve, we think protocol-level UX will become a focal point for designers, developers, and project leaders alike.

1 Like