Thanks for checking out MetaPayP2P — a lot has changed since the Vibe Session demo.
Back then, what you saw was a simple distribution and reclaim loop.
Now, the system has grown into a fully interactive economic simulation with AI governance, peer‑to‑peer transactions, and adaptive policy logic — all running transparently on‑chain.
1. In what ways does this approach differ from traditional UBI programs we’ve seen before?
The original version was about proving that a fixed‑fund circulation model can sustain itself without new taxes or inflation.
In the current version, we’ve moved far beyond that:
- Users can now send MetaPay and Cash in parallel to simulate real‑world spending behavior.
- Transfers can happen in any direction: user ↔ user, user ↔ company, company ↔ company, and state ↔ user.
- This allows us to model realistic economic flows — not just a closed test loop.
2. How can the model remain sustainable without additional tax revenue after the initial funding?
The system starts with a fixed initial fund, which continuously circulates through distribution and reclaim cycles.
Because reclaimed MetaPay is reused for the next distribution, no new tax revenue or monetary issuance is required, keeping the economy inflation‑neutral.
3. Could you explain how the 10‑month distribution and 10% reclaim cycle would work in real‑world usage?
In a real‑world scenario:
- The state distributes a fixed amount (e.g., $500) monthly to all eligible wallets for 10 months.
- At the end of the 10th month, 10% of each wallet’s remaining balance is reclaimed into the state wallet.
- This reclaimed amount becomes the fund for the following month’s distribution.
- The loop — 10 distributions, 1 reclaim, repeat — keeps the same initial capital in perpetual circulation.
4. How does the 50:50 spending rule help in controlling inflation or preventing misuse?
Every transaction must be made with 50% MetaPay and 50% Cash.
This ensures:
- No “MetaPay‑only” hoarding or speculation.
- Continued engagement with the broader cash economy.
- Natural balancing — high spenders contribute more MetaPay back into circulation.
5. On the technical side, how are the distribution and reclaim functions implemented in the smart contract to ensure accuracy and fairness?
- All core functions run on‑chain with transparent execution.
- AI‑driven anomaly detection monitors for suspicious behavior (e.g., circular transfers, sudden large cash‑outs).
- This ensures fair distribution and prevents abuse without manual intervention.
6. Does the AI analysis module directly interact with on‑chain data, or does it rely on an off‑chain backend service?
The AI operates entirely on Hyperion infrastructure using Alith AI:
- Reads on‑chain data in real time.
- Produces verifiable, auditable insights.
- Feeds recommendations directly into the policy layer for near‑instant contract adjustments.
7. Is the smart contract fully open source, and has it undergone any security audits?
Yes — all code, AI logic, and transaction history are open for review.
Although no third‑party audit has yet been completed, the architecture is designed for full transparency and public verification.
8. Have you considered scalability challenges if this were deployed on a large‑scale mainnet?
Yes — while the current demo uses 10 user wallets and 5 company wallets for clarity, the system supports thousands of participants.
Potential real‑world applications include:
- Small‑nation basic income pilots.
- Local community economic systems.
- DAO‑governed reward and incentive models.
Hyperion’s parallel execution engine ensures that even high transaction volumes can be processed without congestion.
If anyone wants to see how the AI reacts to sudden spending spikes, abnormal transfers, or liquidity drops, I’m happy to arrange a guided walkthrough.
The code, AI logic, and transaction history are fully open for review.
By combining economic sustainability, AI governance, and total transparency,
MetaPayP2P is more than a demo — it’s an ongoing experiment in building self‑adjusting, trustless economies on‑chain.